My family ran a distributed provenance ledger for 150 years, on paper · The Graph

Concept

What this is

Seventh-day Adventist communities kept genealogies with unusual rigor — searching church records to trace lineage as far back as documents allowed, and publishing a book updated roughly every twenty years recording which children each family member had. Who begat whom, in the biblical manner, carried forward by successive volumes.

Name what that actually is. A distributed attribution record, maintained by a community rather than an authority, versioned at intervals, in which each entry's validity depends on the entries around it and correction propagates through subsequent editions. Nobody owns it. Nobody can unilaterally rewrite it. Its integrity comes from many independent parties having recorded the same thing.

S-086 widens the frame in two directions. Outward: the descents the ledger documents now anchor the record's Westphalia trail — Charlemagne's empire fought the Thirty Years War, William the Silent's republic fought the Eighty Years' War, and one treaty ended both, in the family's own tree. Inward: the tradition that kept the ledger — the Adventists — evolved into a missionary movement of wandering doctors, mostly doing good works rather than proselytizing a creed, spreading knowledge of a life meant to be followed by example; a community that keeps append-only truth across its branches and sends its doctors out to serve was practicing several of this architecture's principles before the architecture had names for them. The record notes the resemblance without claiming the lineage caused the design. Though it does wonder.

This page carries part of the argument of the Consilient Manifesto — the universal call to action — and the way back to the call is one click.

The record

Where this intersects the work

Each entry below carries its own provenance — the source, and how it was processed. That is the condition on which this graph can be extended by anyone without degrading.

Jonathan’s account · S-086 →Jonathan’s account · S-104 →Jonathan’s account · S-105 →Jonathan’s account · S-107 →Jonathan’s account · S-146 →

L1 · SummaryThe graphYou are here — rapid understanding, forwardable

L2 · EpisodeThe storyHis story, in his voice — ../../episodes/cromwell-newton-and-the-mint/L3 · SourceIn his own wordsThe verbatim account — immutable, with its research context

The trail exists so that people who were there can reconstruct their own memories, recognize what they helped incubate, and add to or correct the record — or forward the few pages that belong to someone they know.

—

Why it is in this record

Jonathan Hare grew up inside a working provenance system and did not think of it as one. Decades later he built an architecture whose central mechanism is attribution that survives transformation, is maintained by no central party, and is corrected rather than overwritten.

The parallel is not decorative. The Ledger is the contribution graph, implemented in paper and community discipline, running for a century and a half before anyone needed a word for it.

Hare's accountHare's account, recorded 2026

—

What it recorded, in this family

By the family's four lineage books — the Hare, Whitson, Wickwire, and Stansberry trees, one for each of the author's four biological grandparents — the lines run to Prince William of Orange the Silent, father of the Dutch Republic, and to Sir Oliver Cromwell of Hinchingbrooke — the Royalist uncle of Oliver Cromwell the Lord Protector, which settles which side of that argument the family was on. The Stansberry tree carries the deep line: Charlemagne and the nobility of the Holy Roman Empire, and through it stated relations to the House of Windsor, the Hereditary Prince of Baden, and Wilhelm von Bismarck — all at family grade, on the author's research of the books (S-146). Beyond that stands the passage the record grades exactly as the family does: by Carolingian lore, the line runs to Jesus Christ — assuming Mary Magdalene was pregnant with his child at the crucifixion — the Merovingian footnote, kept at lore grade because the ledger keeps the grade and the simulation gets the story.

Two honest notes, one kept and one corrected. Kept: descent from Charlemagne is near-universal among people of European ancestry — the mathematics of doubling ancestors makes it close to certain rather than remarkable — which is precisely why what matters here is not the descent but the record-keeping: a named, documented line through four maintained books is rare even where the ancestry is common. Corrected: an earlier rendering of this page ran the line through 'William of Orange and Mary' and to the Lord Protector himself, with a daughter-line caveat — conflations of the record's own making, corrected by the author's research of the four trees, with the correction published alongside per the record's doctrine (S-146).

Family record · lore where markedThe four family lineage books, per the author's research — source record S-146; the Magdalene passage at lore grade

Recorded 25 August 2026

The fourth book

The ledger ran to four volumes, not three. The record itself counted three — Hare, Whitson, Wickwire — until the author caught the omission: the Stansberry book, his grandmother Joy's family, whose published history traces the line to Charlemagne and the Holy Roman Empire and carries the familial connections to the House of Windsor, the Prince of Baden, the von Bismarcks, and Prince William of Orange the Silent. He forgot the volume belonging to the matriarch he knew best — Grandma Stansberry, Joy's mother, who lived to ninety-nine or so and whom he visited in Willows dozens of times. The correction is published rather than silently applied, in the same spirit as the books themselves: each edition extending and correcting the last.

Hare's accountHare's correction, in his own words — source record S-104

Recorded 25 August 2026

The Merovingian footnote, kept because it is fun

The Record Update document carries one paragraph the ledger's grading cannot hold and the record keeps anyway: the Merovingian hypothesis — the Da Vinci Code lore in which Charlemagne's Carolingians absorbed a Merovingian bloodline said by some to descend from Jesus of Nazareth and Mary Magdalene. Stated plainly: the Carolingian genealogy is documented; the Magdalene hypothesis is popularized fiction, resting on the Priory of Sion material — a twentieth-century fabrication — and this record does not claim otherwise. It is published at lore grade because Hare ruled it in for the honest reason: it is fun. And fun is load-bearing here. One application of this graph is a new form of AI-enabled entertainment and human engagement for a world where AI and robots do most of the work — and in an ancestor simulation, lore honestly graded is exactly the material: anyone may run the world in which the legend is true, harm no one, and know precisely which shelf the story came from. The ledger keeps the grade; the simulation gets the story.

Lore — kept for the fun of itFrom the Record Update document (S-106), published at lore grade on Hare's ruling — source record S-105

Recorded 25 August 2026

The arithmetic that outruns the hoax

The lore footnote above does not need the hoax to be true, and the reason is the same arithmetic this record already applies to Charlemagne. Go back enough generations in a bounded region like Europe and the ancestry graph saturates: basically everyone is related to everyone, and anyone who lived a millennium ago and left a surviving line is an ancestor of virtually every European alive. So regardless of the Priory of Sion's authenticity — it has none — if Jesus in fact had a child, with Magdalene or anyone else, whose line continued in France, then virtually everyone with European ancestry is a descendant, documented lineage or not. The hypothesis stays on the lore shelf; the conditional is just mathematics.

The second half of the arithmetic is the humbling one. Genealogical descent and genetic descent come apart: go back around four hundred years and the probability that any particular ancestor contributed a specific gene to you approaches zero — you carry DNA from only a fraction of your genealogical ancestors, as a simple matter of recombination and halving. But the same genes are not lost; they ride down through other branches of the family. The individual line forgets; the population remembers. And where marriage stays inside a community — noble houses preferentially marrying noble houses, or relatively closed denominations like the Quakers and the Seventh-day Adventists — relatedness stays measurably higher across the generations: the community keeps more of its own inheritance coherent.

Which is why the four books matter more than any bloodline they record: descent from anyone notable is nearly universal and genetically nearly empty. What the ledger actually preserves — what endogamous communities actually transmit — is not genes. It is governance content.

Hare's accountHare's argument, in his own words — source record S-107; the population-genetics modelling is Chang (1999) and Rohde, Olson & Chang (Nature, 2004)

The graph

Connected from here

There is no single root. This is one view of the graph, from this node — what you see depends on where you enter and what you are looking for.

the node in it that matters most

Oliver Cromwell — my ancestor’s nephew — accidentally created the Royal Society

Temporary authority, used to incubate something meant to outlive it

Open →where it terminates

Charlemagne, where the family record ends — and why that says less than you think

Where the Ledger terminates — and where lineage stops meaning much

Open →anchors the trail to

Westphalia ended two wars by refusing to settle the theology — and both wars are family

1648: modern diplomacy's birth certificate, the essay's chapter-ten hinge — the empire of one ancestor, the republic of another

Open →the tradition's account runs to the era of

Constantine ran the Empire on multiple faiths and took baptism on his deathbed — the essay's thesis, fourth-century edition

Converted through his mother Helena; presided over Nicaea's unification of a three-century diaspora of sects; aligned with every tradition, for the good of the Empire

Open →story fuel for

You may be living in your descendants' ancestor simulation — and the essay makes the unfalsifiability a treaty

Bostrom's term, put to unexpected work: the mutual grant that costs nothing and disarms the basement wars

Open →working model for

Somebody has to author the genome. Here is why it should be public

Somebody has to author the genome

Open →

Provenance

Where this came from

Everything above is a distillation. The primary source is published in full, so that any claim on this page can be walked back to what was actually said — and where the two differ, the source governs.

Primary source · S-086