Consilient Network· The graph of everyone who built this · Add your entry ↗
The Graph · Concept

The Consilient Angels: the people who backed it when nobody else would

The diplomatic and cultural vanguard

About this entry

This is Jonathan Hare's account, with its provenance shown. The person or organization named has not yet claimed or corrected it.

Concept

What this is

The group Jonathan Hare brought in after the patents were filed, to carry the explanation rather than have him carry it alone.

His stated reasoning, recorded as his: that the people currently building AI are selected for a disposition that is not caring, that governance therefore needs people who lead with empathy, and that he trusts this group to do it better than he would.

S-101 dates and grounds the roll's formation: in 2026, emerging from six months of total social isolation spent documenting and patenting the architecture with AI, Hare reached out to the former girlfriends of his 1995–2012 era to invite them to become Consilient Angels — the outreach of which Olchi's page carries the first and finest fruit.

The record

Where this intersects the work

Each entry below carries its own provenance — the source, and how it was processed. That is the condition on which this graph can be extended by anyone without degrading.

The trail exists so that people who were there can reconstruct their own memories, recognize what they helped incubate, and add to or correct the record — or forward the few pages that belong to someone they know.

2025–26

Why after, and not before

Novelty rules in China and the EU are absolute: publish to anyone not under NDA and the patent rights are gone. So he went into what he calls Einstein mode for six months and spoke to nobody, filed nine applications covering 2,091 claims, and only then brought people in. The isolation was a legal requirement, not a temperament.

Hare's accountAuthor's account — source record S-015
The graph

Connected from here

There is no single root. This is one view of the graph, from this node — what you see depends on where you enter and what you are looking for.

Provenance

Where this came from

Everything above is a distillation. The primary source is published in full, so that any claim on this page can be walked back to what was actually said — and where the two differ, the source governs.

Claim your edge

What is missing, and how to fix it

This entry is deliberately incomplete. The gaps below are the things only certain people can settle — and settling one is a contribution like any other: recorded, timestamped and attributed to whoever made it.

If you were there

Correct anything wrong, add what only you know, or claim this entry as your own. Write to evidence@qpncatalyst.io and Jonathan directly (both are on the button) — a timestamped confirmation comes back with your submission attached, as your own independent record. No account, no permission, no institutional standing required.

Public contributions earn Publicity Premium; bringing others who were there earns Cascade Premium. Everything is valued retrospectively as outcomes verify, so nothing has to be priced up front.

Correct this entry → Add a story, photo or link → Browse the graph →
Where this leads

Pull the next thread

Share this
Share this page: X · LinkedIn · Email · Copy link
← PreviousAll entities
+ Add to the record