Outreach target — one conversation, 2000
Recalled but not checked against any source. Treat everything here as a first draft awaiting correction.
Member of the British royal family. Listed here because Jonathan Hare met him once, in 2000, and because royalty are eligible under the same Sovereign and Royal outreach terms as any head of state.
Hare claims no ongoing relationship and has had no contact since.
Each entry below carries its own provenance — the source, and how it was processed. That is the condition on which this graph can be extended by anyone without degrading.
The trail exists so that people who were there can reconstruct their own memories, recognize what they helped incubate, and add to or correct the record — or forward the few pages that belong to someone they know.
Introduced by Ghislaine Maxwell at a Halloween party at the Hudson Hotel. Hare's account: he was extremely well mannered and easy-going for a senior royal, and they talked for some while. Adam Dell, whom Hare had brought, made a mildly off-color joke that did not land, and Hare excused himself.
There is no single root. This is one view of the graph, from this node — what you see depends on where you enter and what you are looking for.
One party, several calls, a Santa Fe trip that never happened
Open →both presentSanta Fe, New York, and the hundred-million remark
Open →both present, October 2000Known the way anyone in society circles knew him — which is to say, barely
Open →where they metOctober 2000 — photographed, published, and consistent with the account
Open →Everything above is a distillation. The primary source is published in full, so that any claim on this page can be walked back to what was actually said — and where the two differ, the source governs.
This record is not biography attached to a technical claim. Each runs into the other: the experiences below produced the mechanisms, and the mechanisms are what those experiences turned out to require.
This page is the anecdote — the thing that draws you in. The explainers are where the mechanism is set out in full, with the problem it solves and the condition on which it fails.
The mechanism, set out in full with the condition that would defeat it.
Open the explainer →Consilient Innovators NetworkThe mechanism, set out in full with the condition that would defeat it.
Open the explainer →Quantum Adaptive Systems TheoryThe mechanism, set out in full with the condition that would defeat it.
Open the explainer →This entry is deliberately incomplete. The gaps below are the things only certain people can settle — and settling one is a contribution like any other: recorded, timestamped and attributed to whoever made it.
Correct anything wrong, add what only you know, or claim this entry as your own. Write to evidence@qpncatalyst.io and Jonathan directly (both are on the button) — a timestamped confirmation comes back with your submission attached, as your own independent record. No account, no permission, no institutional standing required.
Public contributions earn Publicity Premium; bringing others who were there earns Cascade Premium. Everything is valued retrospectively as outcomes verify, so nothing has to be priced up front.
Correct this entry → Add a story, photo or link → Browse the graph →