Consilient Network· The graph of everyone who built this · Add your entry ↗
The Graph · Concept

I was a Reagan Republican when that still meant something

A breed that no longer exists, and two men who were the real thing

About this entry

This is Jonathan Hare's account, with its provenance shown. The person or organization named has not yet claimed or corrected it.

Concept

What this is

Jonathan Hare describes his own former politics precisely: a fiscally responsible Reagan Republican of the purist wing — a description he attaches to a breed he says no longer exists.

He raises it not as affiliation but as calibration. Someone who has held a position honestly can describe what its serious version looked like, and can distinguish it from what now carries the same name.

The relationships behind it are closer than the earlier version of this page implied. Paul Ryan and Pat Toomey were both housemates — renting rooms in Jim Woodhill's house on Capitol Hill, where Hare stayed whenever he was in Washington.

The record

Where this intersects the work

Each entry below carries its own provenance — the source, and how it was processed. That is the condition on which this graph can be extended by anyone without degrading.

The trail exists so that people who were there can reconstruct their own memories, recognize what they helped incubate, and add to or correct the record — or forward the few pages that belong to someone they know.

2000s

Toomey and Ryan, as he assessed them

He tried to explain the distinction to Pat Toomey once, after Toomey had left the House and was running the Club for Growth — then the premier home of that purist wing. They were housemates at the time; both Toomey and Paul Ryan rented rooms in the same house on Capitol Hill.

His reading of the two men, recorded as his opinion: Paul Ryan, later Speaker and at that point chairman of the Budget Committee, was the true fiscal conservative of the pair. Toomey was more of a supply-sider — but an evidence-based one, in favor of cutting taxes in ways that actually increased growth and revenue.

As distinct, in Hare's formulation, from cutting them to line the pockets of donors who inherited their money, or of people exploiting the capitalist system in one way or another.

That distinction — between a policy designed to grow the base and one designed to transfer from it — is the same distinction this record makes everywhere between adding value and extracting it.

Hare's accountHare's account and assessment, recorded 2026 — source record S-046
The graph

Connected from here

There is no single root. This is one view of the graph, from this node — what you see depends on where you enter and what you are looking for.

Claim your edge

What is missing, and how to fix it

This entry is deliberately incomplete. The gaps below are the things only certain people can settle — and settling one is a contribution like any other: recorded, timestamped and attributed to whoever made it.

If you were there

Correct anything wrong, add what only you know, or claim this entry as your own. Write to evidence@qpncatalyst.io and Jonathan directly (both are on the button) — a timestamped confirmation comes back with your submission attached, as your own independent record. No account, no permission, no institutional standing required.

Public contributions earn Publicity Premium; bringing others who were there earns Cascade Premium. Everything is valued retrospectively as outcomes verify, so nothing has to be priced up front.

Correct this entry → Add a story, photo or link → Browse the graph →
Where this leads

Pull the next thread

Share this
Share this page: X · LinkedIn · Email · Copy link
← PreviousAll entities
+ Add to the record