Consilient Network· The graph of everyone who built this · Add your entry ↗
The Graph · Concept

The patent portfolio: nine filings, 2,091 claims — and the allowables that money, not examiners, killed

US 12,316,610 B1 at the foundation, 2016 priority; granted Resilient-era patents awaiting their primary documents; abandoned allowances as the untold cost of survival

About this entry

This is Jonathan Hare's account, with its provenance shown. The person or organization named has not yet claimed or corrected it.

Concept

What this is

The documented anchor: US 12,316,610 B1, the foundational patent of the Quantum Privacy Network architecture — granted May 2025 on a priority chain reaching back to 2016 — sits atop nine patent filings carrying 2,091 claims in total, 2,071 of them publicly readable across six filings. That is the portfolio's spine as the corpus documents it.

The granted estate, from the primary records (S-093), now documented: US 8,843,997 B1, 'Resilient trust network services' — the company's namesake invention, sole inventor Jonathan Paul Jonathan Hare, priority August 2010, granted September 2014: the Resilient Trust Network as an application-integration platform with shared trust services enforcing security requirements wherever services run. US 8,752,069 and US 8,347,313 — the Consilient-era process-thread family, co-invented with Mathew Spolin: a uniform record of collaborative process threads across different applications, which is the Consilient product line in patent form. And US 12,316,610 B1 at the foundation. A documented coda that corroborates the abandonment story: in May 2021 the Resilient estate was assigned to Data443 Risk Mitigation — the wind-down disposing of its intellectual property, exactly as Hare's account of the company's decline describes. Two numbers earlier supplied by an AI research pass (9,197,633; 9,565,183) failed verification against the assignee record and are retired as phantom citations; the cautionary exhibit is S-092.

What the record has not yet listed, per Hare's testimony (S-092), are the earlier granted patents of the Resilient Network Systems era — and the part of the story patents pages never tell: at least one application reached allowance — the examiner's yes, with only fees and attorneys between it and a grant — and was abandoned because Resilient, slowly going out of business after Hare's departure, stopped paying to prosecute it. Many more allowable applications were abandoned over the years for financial constraints or because they lacked strategic value. An abandoned allowance is not a rejected idea; it is an approved idea that ran out of company. The record counts them as part of the intellectual history even where the USPTO counts them as lapsed.

A grading note, in the house discipline: a supplied AI-generated list of the Resilient-era grants failed verification against USPTO records — real-looking numbers attached to plausible titles, the classic failure mode of machine-cited patents — and is therefore held in the source record at UNVERIFIED rather than published here, per the rule that secondary AI output never migrates as fact (S-082 precedent). The display list will be built from primary documents when they arrive, and the ask is filed below.

The portfolio’s living successor is the architecture itself: the granted estate documented above is the legal spine under the Quantum Privacy Network, whose openly licensed model — value shared through the token layer rather than patent enforcement — is set out across the Six Universals and the explainer editions.

The graph

Connected from here

There is no single root. This is one view of the graph, from this node — what you see depends on where you enter and what you are looking for.

Provenance

Where this came from

Everything above is a distillation. The primary source is published in full, so that any claim on this page can be walked back to what was actually said — and where the two differ, the source governs.

Claim your edge

What is missing, and how to fix it

This entry is deliberately incomplete. The gaps below are the things only certain people can settle — and settling one is a contribution like any other: recorded, timestamped and attributed to whoever made it.

If you were there

Correct anything wrong, add what only you know, or claim this entry as your own. Write to evidence@qpncatalyst.io and Jonathan directly (both are on the button) — a timestamped confirmation comes back with your submission attached, as your own independent record. No account, no permission, no institutional standing required.

Public contributions earn Publicity Premium; bringing others who were there earns Cascade Premium. Everything is valued retrospectively as outcomes verify, so nothing has to be priced up front.

Correct this entry → Add a story, photo or link → Browse the graph →
Where this leads

Pull the next thread

Share this
Share this page: X · LinkedIn · Email · Copy link
← PreviousAll entities
+ Add to the record