The account as dictated, preserved verbatim. Everything elsewhere on this site that derives from it is a distillation — and where the two differ, this governs.
Dictated by Jonathan Paul Hare in working sessions with Claude (Anthropic) and transcribed in-session. Lightly cleaned for typographic errors and false starts; wording, sequence and emphasis preserved. Not an audio transcript. Where the distilled page differs from the source, the source governs.
You're missing some of my granted patents were missing. Also one that was allowable, but abandoned by Resilient Network Systems because they were slowly going out of business after my departure. Below are what Gemini found for granted patents. Can you add these, and indicate that there many more allowable patent applications which were abandoned due to financial constraints or because they lacked strategic value.
[Gemini-supplied list, as provided:] 1. US Patent 9,197,633 B2 — Title: Methods and Systems for Dynamic Contextual Trust and Access Resolution in Distributed Networks — Assignee: Resilient Network Systems, Inc. — Core Focus: Establishing automated, decentralized trust relationships and access rights between network participants without relying on a single centralized authority. It covers dynamic policy resolution based on contextual attributes, multi-party trust factors, and distributed verification.
2. US Patent 9,565,183 B2 — Title: Systems and Methods for Policy-Driven Dynamic Data Sharing and Privacy-Preserving Intermediation — Assignee: Resilient Network Systems, Inc. — Core Focus: Mechanisms for secure, policy-governed data exchange across autonomous boundaries. It details the trust engine architecture capable of evaluating complex, multi-dimensional rule sets to broker data access while preserving zero-trust privacy boundaries.
3. US Patent 12,316,610 B1 — Title: Decentralized Trust Network Architecture and Cryptographic Authorization Systems — Granted: May 2025 (Priority tracing to 2016) — Assignee: Resilient / WebShield / Quantum Privacy Architecture Portfolio — Core Focus: The foundational architecture for high-scale, multi-party decentralized trust networks. It incorporates hardware-rooted trust, multi-layer cryptographic verification, and distributed execution environments to enable zero-knowledge and post-quantum resilient data flows.
Key Architectural Themes Across the Portfolio: Decentralized Policy Resolution: Replacing static identity and access management (IAM) with dynamic, multi-factored trust scoring. Contextual Authorization: Brokering transactions and data releases based on situational policies rather than static credentials. Autonomous Intermediation: Enabling cross-domain interoperability without creating centralized honeypots or single points of compromise.
Corrections applied downstream are recorded here rather than made silently. The source above is unaltered.
Two registers in this record, graded separately — and the grading is the story. Hare's own testimony, graded recorded and published at full strength: the record's patent count is incomplete; at least one application reached allowance but was abandoned by Resilient Network Systems, which was slowly going out of business after his departure and stopped paying prosecution costs; and many more allowable applications were abandoned over the years for financial constraints or because they lacked strategic value — allowance being the examiner's yes, with only fees and lawyers between it and a grant. The Gemini-supplied specifics, graded UNVERIFIED after a verification pass on 2026-08-20: searches of USPTO-indexed records found no US 9,197,633 or US 9,565,183 matching the supplied titles or the Resilient Network Systems assignee — the numbers exist as patents but appear to belong to unrelated inventions, the classic failure mode of AI-generated patent citations, in which real-looking numbers are attached to plausible titles. Per the corpus's standing rule (S-082 precedent; Corpus-first discipline), unverified secondary AI output does not migrate to display pages as fact; the two numbers and titles are held in this source record only, with the defeating condition stated: production of the patent PDFs, USPTO Patent Center records, or an inventor-name search settles the question in one direction; continued absence settles it in the other. The foundational patent US 12,316,610 B1 (May 2025 grant, 2016 priority) is already corpus-documented independently of Gemini and stands. The ask, filed on the portfolio page: the primary documents — an USPTO inventor-name search for Jonathan Hare, or the grant PDFs from Rich Muth's files — from which the display list will be built correctly and completely.
Each page below is a distillation of the account above. The chain is recorded in both directions so that a reader, a journalist or a future system can walk from a claim back to what was actually said.
A source record can be wrong about the world even when it accurately preserves what was said. Corrections are recorded alongside rather than replacing it — nothing here is overwritten.
Write to evidence@qpncatalyst.io and Jonathan directly — both are on the button — or use the structured contribution form. A timestamped confirmation comes back with your submission attached, as your own independent record.
Correct or extend S-092 → All source records →