Consilient Network· The graph of everyone who built this · Add your entry ↗
The Graph · Concept

My family were missionaries. Here is the honest version of what that means

A distinction Hare draws, with the caveat that historians would qualify it

About this entry

This is Jonathan Hare's account, with its provenance shown. The person or organization named has not yet claimed or corrected it.

Concept

What this is

The Jonathan Hare and Wickwire families were Seventh-day Adventist missionaries for generations, working in remote and often dangerous territories.

Hare's claim, recorded as his: that Adventist missionaries preached and then left, rather than remaining to govern — and that this differs in kind from the Spanish and Portuguese Catholic missions, the French orders in North America, the Dutch, and the English Puritans and Anglicans, all of whom spread Christianity in company with conquest.

The record

Where this intersects the work

Each entry below carries its own provenance — the source, and how it was processed. That is the condition on which this graph can be extended by anyone without degrading.

The trail exists so that people who were there can reconstruct their own memories, recognize what they helped incubate, and add to or correct the record — or forward the few pages that belong to someone they know.

What is defensible in it, and what is not

The structural point holds. Adventism arose in the nineteenth-century United States, after the age of confessional conquest and without a state or an army attached. Its missions were not instruments of territorial administration, because there was no territory to administer. That is a genuine difference and it is not a matter of virtue — it is a matter of what was available.

The comparative claim is where a historian would push back. Protestant missions of every kind operated inside colonial structures they did not create and frequently benefited from, and “leaving the culture intact” describes an intention more often than an outcome. Literacy, dress, marriage practice and language were reshaped by missions that carried no soldiers at all.

Both are recorded. The distinction Hare draws is real; it is narrower than the framing suggests.

One correction: the Huguenots were French Protestants, persecuted rather than sponsored. The French Catholic missions were the work of Jesuit, Récollet and Sulpician orders.

Hare's accountHare's claim, with historical qualification — source record S-034
The graph

Connected from here

There is no single root. This is one view of the graph, from this node — what you see depends on where you enter and what you are looking for.

Provenance

Where this came from

Everything above is a distillation. The primary source is published in full, so that any claim on this page can be walked back to what was actually said — and where the two differ, the source governs.

Claim your edge

What is missing, and how to fix it

This entry is deliberately incomplete. The gaps below are the things only certain people can settle — and settling one is a contribution like any other: recorded, timestamped and attributed to whoever made it.

If you were there

Correct anything wrong, add what only you know, or claim this entry as your own. Write to evidence@qpncatalyst.io and Jonathan directly (both are on the button) — a timestamped confirmation comes back with your submission attached, as your own independent record. No account, no permission, no institutional standing required.

Public contributions earn Publicity Premium; bringing others who were there earns Cascade Premium. Everything is valued retrospectively as outcomes verify, so nothing has to be priced up front.

Correct this entry → Add a story, photo or link → Browse the graph →
Where this leads

Pull the next thread

Share this
Share this page: X · LinkedIn · Email · Copy link
← PreviousAll entities
+ Add to the record