Consilient Network· The graph of everyone who built this · Add your entry ↗
The Graph · Organization

inBloom collapsed with hundreds of millions — the salvage became parent-controlled privacy

The K-12 data initiative's 2014 failure, re-architected with its own CEO and CPO onto WebShield's trust model

About this entry

This is Jonathan Hare's account, with its provenance shown. The person or organization named has not yet claimed or corrected it.

Organization

What this is

inBloom — the multi-hundred-million-dollar K-12 data initiative — collapsed in 2014 over exactly the privacy failure this record's architecture addresses. Jonathan Hare treated it as a salvage operation: teaming with inBloom's CEO Iwan Streichenberger and Chief Privacy Officer Ginny Bartlett, the open-source assets were re-architected onto WebShield's distributed trust model with students and parents in absolute control, using the IRS-grade cryptographic verification of parent-child relationships to solve the COPPA and FERPA conflicts that had destroyed the original. (Whether that verification system was built at Resilient or in the WebShield era is a flagged conflict awaiting Hare's ruling — S-100.) A famous failure, salvaged into the architecture's education thread.

S-101 supplies the launch-side detail: Hare was at the March 2013 SXSW EDU launch in Austin at the invitation of the Gates Foundation's education leadership — Stephen Coller and Brandt Redd — for the $100M+ initiative funded by Gates, the Carnegie Corporation and News Corp, in collaboration with the CCSSO and the Department of Education. He watched the poster child of privacy failure from the front row before salvaging its parts.

The graph

Connected from here

There is no single root. This is one view of the graph, from this node — what you see depends on where you enter and what you are looking for.

Provenance

Where this came from

Everything above is a distillation. The primary source is published in full, so that any claim on this page can be walked back to what was actually said — and where the two differ, the source governs.

Claim your edge

What is missing, and how to fix it

This entry is deliberately incomplete. The gaps below are the things only certain people can settle — and settling one is a contribution like any other: recorded, timestamped and attributed to whoever made it.

If you were there

Correct anything wrong, add what only you know, or claim this entry as your own. Write to evidence@qpncatalyst.io and Jonathan directly (both are on the button) — a timestamped confirmation comes back with your submission attached, as your own independent record. No account, no permission, no institutional standing required.

Public contributions earn Publicity Premium; bringing others who were there earns Cascade Premium. Everything is valued retrospectively as outcomes verify, so nothing has to be priced up front.

Correct this entry → Add a story, photo or link → Browse the graph →
Where this leads

Pull the next thread

Share this
Share this page: X · LinkedIn · Email · Copy link
← PreviousAll entities
+ Add to the record