Consilient Network· The graph of everyone who built this · Add your entry ↗
The Graph · Person

E. O. Wilson gave me the commission, the foundation, and the name

The commission, the foundation, and the name

About this entry

This is Jonathan Hare's account, with its provenance shown. The person or organization named has not yet claimed or corrected it.

Person

Who this is

Biologist, twice a Pulitzer winner, and author of Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge — the book that gave this network its name and its thesis.

Jonathan Hare renamed his company Consilient in order to reach him. They met at Harvard, agreed to launch a foundation, lost five years to the 2001 collapse, met again by chance on a path at Aspen Meadows in 2006, and the conversation resumed. He gave Hare a personal commission in 2013.

In August 2026 the corpus extended his program by one deliberate step: The Unification of All Faiths and Science through Consilience — one mathematics, many heavens — argues that what Wilson wanted for the branches of knowledge holds for the faiths as well: one representational space, coordinate systems rather than error lists, and unification of the substrate rather than the doctrines. The essay's ledger keeps the Asimov discipline; its title keeps his word.

The record

Where this intersects the work

Each entry below carries its own provenance — the source, and how it was processed. That is the condition on which this graph can be extended by anyone without degrading.

The trail exists so that people who were there can reconstruct their own memories, recognize what they helped incubate, and add to or correct the record — or forward the few pages that belong to someone they know.

2006

The wish, and the board

At Aspen in 2006 Wilson told him the foundation they had discussed in 2000 existed — funded by Jay Short, and with Nobel laureates, Jeffrey Sachs, Steven Pinker and Harrison Ford on the board. It won the TED Prize, and the wish was an Encyclopedia of Life. Hare's response was that the encyclopedia was the wrong unit of ambition: what the wish needed was not a catalog but an ecosystem in which any body of knowledge could be contributed, found, trusted, recombined and rewarded.

Hare's accountAuthor's direct narrative — source record S-016
The graph

Connected from here

There is no single root. This is one view of the graph, from this node — what you see depends on where you enter and what you are looking for.

Provenance

Where this came from

Everything above is a distillation. The primary source is published in full, so that any claim on this page can be walked back to what was actually said — and where the two differ, the source governs.

Claim your edge

What is missing, and how to fix it

This entry is deliberately incomplete. The gaps below are the things only certain people can settle — and settling one is a contribution like any other: recorded, timestamped and attributed to whoever made it.

If you were there

Correct anything wrong, add what only you know, or claim this entry as your own. Write to evidence@qpncatalyst.io and Jonathan directly (both are on the button) — a timestamped confirmation comes back with your submission attached, as your own independent record. No account, no permission, no institutional standing required.

Public contributions earn Publicity Premium; bringing others who were there earns Cascade Premium. Everything is valued retrospectively as outcomes verify, so nothing has to be priced up front.

Correct this entry → Add a story, photo or link → Browse the graph →
Where this leads

Pull the next thread

Share this
Share this page: X · LinkedIn · Email · Copy link
← PreviousAll entities
+ Add to the record