Consilient Network· The graph of everyone who built this · Add your entry ↗
Outreach path

Why Kleiner, NEA and Oak Hill structurally cannot hold this

A ten-year fund life cannot hold a multi-century instrument. The structures that can are the ones organized around perpetual trusts — and there are not many of them.

7 stopsFor: Multi-generational capital, family offices, sovereign wealth, and public-benefit trustsAll paths
Conventional venture is not hostile to this. It is structurally incapable of holding it, which is a different and more interesting problem.
The path

Follow it in order

Each stop is a page in the graph. The order is an argument — but every one of them is also a door into the rest of it, so you can leave the path wherever it stops being useful.

Where it lands

What the path is for

The point

The collateral is not a company, a portfolio or a reserve. It is a protocol-level claim on the settlement of an entire network — which is the first instrument in a long time whose duration actually matches the thing it is funding.

Add to this record → Other paths →

Share this
← PreviousAll paths
+ Add to the record