Consilient Network· The graph of everyone who built this · Add your entry ↗
Source record · S-118

Verbatim quotes about Resilient Threads — the March 2004 reception document

The account as dictated, preserved verbatim. Everything elsewhere on this site that derives from it is a distillation — and where the two differ, this governs.

Recorded 2026-08-25Hare's contemporaneous compilation document, 10 March 2004 ('Resilient Quotes'), from his archive, transcribed verbatim. Documented grade as an archival artifact; the quotes themselves are as Hare recorded them at the time.All sources
Provenance

Dictated by Jonathan Paul Hare in working sessions with Claude (Anthropic) and transcribed in-session. Lightly cleaned for typographic errors and false starts; wording, sequence and emphasis preserved. Not an audio transcript. Where the distilled page differs from the source, the source governs.

Primary source

As dictated

Verbatim quotes about Resilient Threads - A meeting with four staffers at the SEC: ? "Of course the SEC would love it if everyone used threads." ? "It's good to know that there is such amazing technology out there to help people comply with Sarbanes-Oxley." ? "I'm sure you'll get tremendous interest with this product." (Repeated three times in five minutes.) - A meeting with Gartner Group ? "This is awesome - it's simply incredible!" ? "It's a killer app for SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley)" - The Director of Compliance at financial services firm with ~$1 trillion in assets : ? "This is amazing! I see infinite applications for it at the bank, not just in compliance, but everywhere." ? "We're getting killed in compliance by all these regulations, and this is the first thing I've seen that gives me hope." ? "This is important - we need to be on the forefront of adopting this technology." - Meetings with Director of IT Policy, Evaluation and Selection at the General Services Administration: ? "It's a project manager's dream!" ? "You have no idea how unusual it is to see something that is this exciting. I've evaluated software for a living for 20 years, and all these vendor pitches are almost always a total snoozer - so complex and boring you just know it won't really work. And it almost never does. Your stuff is totally different - I can instantly see how it would work, and make the government more efficient. I truly feel I can serve the public trust best by getting the US government to adopt Resilient." ? "Why would anyone use regular email, if they could use a thread?" - Director of Sales Operations of BlueArc, former Controller, Broadvision ? "It's a controller's dream." ? "We could use this all around the company, in every function." - Former President of Wired Digital ? "It's what email always should have been."

Processing

What was changed, and why

Corrections applied downstream are recorded here rather than made silently. The source above is unaltered.

Editorial record

The reception record for Resilient threads in the winter of 2004, compiled contemporaneously: the SEC ('of course the SEC would love it if everyone used threads'), Gartner ('a killer app for SOX'), a trillion-dollar financial institution's compliance director ('the first thing I've seen that gives me hope'), the GSA's twenty-year software evaluator ('I truly feel I can serve the public trust best by getting the US government to adopt Resilient... Why would anyone use regular email, if they could use a thread?'), and the former president of Wired Digital ('It's what email always should have been'). Together with S-117 this documents the original Resilient's initial application focus — Sarbanes-Oxley and broker-dealer compliance — and its analyst and government reception, for the entity split pending the author's answers on names and transition.

Downstream

What was built from this

Each page below is a distillation of the account above. The chain is recorded in both directions so that a reader, a journalist or a future system can walk from a claim back to what was actually said.

Keep going

Records that share this ground

Correction

If you were there

A source record can be wrong about the world even when it accurately preserves what was said. Corrections are recorded alongside rather than replacing it — nothing here is overwritten.

Add to the record

Write to evidence@qpncatalyst.io and Jonathan directly — both are on the button — or use the structured contribution form. A timestamped confirmation comes back with your submission attached, as your own independent record.

Correct or extend S-118 → All source records →
Share this
← PreviousAll sources
+ Add to the record