§12 — Turing: Deployment-Level Alignment Through Cryptographic Containment · §13 — Economics and Peace: Ownership as the Answer to Technological Displacement · §14 — Turing: Compliance as a Property of Computation
The three candidates in this part are separated from the others because they address the same set of problems and because that set is the one the technology industry currently states most loudly about itself. Each is presented in the same four-beat form, and in each case the problem is quoted from the people building the systems rather than from critics of them.
The three compose, and the order matters. Compliance as a property of computation supplies permission, without which containment governs nothing. Containment makes deployed agents structurally safe rather than behaviorally persuaded. Ownership answers what happens to the people whose work the resulting systems displace. A proposal addressing any one of the three in isolation leaves the other two, which is the position the field is currently in.
The composition claim fails if any of the three mechanisms operates without the others in place — if containment governs anything without permission, or if either resolves displacement on its own.